﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Opinions of Dan Fernandes</title>
    <description>Opinions of Dan Fernandes</description>
    <link>http://www.danfernandes.com/IssuesOpinions/tabid/125/BlogId/1/Default.aspx</link>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <managingEditor>Dan@DanFernandes.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>Dan@DanFernandes.com</webMaster>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 18:14:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 18:14:38 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>Blog RSS Generator Version 3.2.0.29758</generator>
    <item>
      <title>Recommendations on State Ballot Measures for the Election of November 7, 2006</title>
      <description>You will find the official state Libertarian Party position on all state ballot measures on it's website at http://ca.lp.org/voteguide_nov06.shtml The Party recommends a YES vote on Prop 1A and Prop 90, and a NO vote on everything else, except for no position on Prop 85. Just to prove my independent thinking, I dare to disagree on 1A and 85. Here is my reasoning. ...</description>
      <link>http://www.danfernandes.com/IssuesOpinions/tabid/125/EntryID/23/Default.aspx</link>
      <author>Dan@DanFernandes.com</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.danfernandes.com/Default.aspx?tabid=125&amp;EntryID=23</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.danfernandes.com/DesktopModules/Blog/Trackback.aspx?id=23</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Recommendations for Propositions 73 - 80 in the Election of November 8, 2005.</title>
      <description>Recommendations for Propositions 73 - 80 in the Election of November 8, 2005.</description>
      <link>http://www.danfernandes.com/IssuesOpinions/tabid/125/EntryID/22/Default.aspx</link>
      <author>Dan@DanFernandes.com</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.danfernandes.com/Default.aspx?tabid=125&amp;EntryID=22</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 16:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.danfernandes.com/DesktopModules/Blog/Trackback.aspx?id=22</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>November 2004 Post-Election Message – from Dan Fernandes</title>
      <description>I thank the more than fourteen thousand voters who voted for me in the November 2004 general election, and I thank the news media and event organizers who provided a respectful forum for me to express my views. Congratulations to my opponent, Bob Margett, who won re-election to the California State Senate by a margin of 28 points.  ...</description>
      <link>http://www.danfernandes.com/IssuesOpinions/tabid/125/EntryID/24/Default.aspx</link>
      <author>Dan@DanFernandes.com</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.danfernandes.com/Default.aspx?tabid=125&amp;EntryID=24</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2004 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.danfernandes.com/DesktopModules/Blog/Trackback.aspx?id=24</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Basic Market Ethics</title>
      <description>People need a set of guiding principles to help them decide difficult  political questions. My guiding principles have to do with market ethics. If some action would violate basic market ethics, then I can be sure it is the wrong action. ...</description>
      <link>http://www.danfernandes.com/IssuesOpinions/tabid/125/EntryID/21/Default.aspx</link>
      <author>Dan@DanFernandes.com</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.danfernandes.com/Default.aspx?tabid=125&amp;EntryID=21</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 06:37:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.danfernandes.com/DesktopModules/Blog/Trackback.aspx?id=21</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Three Strikes Law (Prop 66)</title>
      <description>The Three Strikes Laws create injustices for everyone including the defendants, their families, and the taxpayers. What we are doing with our present Three Strikes Laws is often heartless, and makes no sense. ...</description>
      <link>http://www.danfernandes.com/IssuesOpinions/tabid/125/EntryID/17/Default.aspx</link>
      <author>Dan@DanFernandes.com</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.danfernandes.com/Default.aspx?tabid=125&amp;EntryID=17</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:08:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.danfernandes.com/DesktopModules/Blog/Trackback.aspx?id=17</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mental Healthcare Gravy Train (Prop. 63)</title>
      <description>Prop. 63 earmarks $750 million-plus annual tax expenditure for a narrow special-interest group, namely the mental healthcare industry in California. To pay for this, it assaults an already-burdened category of California taxpayers: those who earn more than $1 million per year. This taxing scheme is a sham which will likely raise no net revenue, but instead will drive enough high-earners out of state to do damage to California's jobs and economic development. ...</description>
      <link>http://www.danfernandes.com/IssuesOpinions/tabid/125/EntryID/18/Default.aspx</link>
      <author>Dan@DanFernandes.com</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.danfernandes.com/Default.aspx?tabid=125&amp;EntryID=18</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2004 18:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.danfernandes.com/DesktopModules/Blog/Trackback.aspx?id=18</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Illegal Immigration</title>
      <description>Talk radio is full of concern these days about illegal immigrants taking away our jobs, burdening our welfare system, and possibly endangering our lives. Employers of illegals are vilified and threatened with prison. People talk of placing troops at the Mexican border to stop illegal traffic. What is going on here? ...</description>
      <link>http://www.danfernandes.com/IssuesOpinions/tabid/125/EntryID/16/Default.aspx</link>
      <author>Dan@DanFernandes.com</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.danfernandes.com/Default.aspx?tabid=125&amp;EntryID=16</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2004 03:25:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.danfernandes.com/DesktopModules/Blog/Trackback.aspx?id=16</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gay Marriage</title>
      <description>Republicans have made gay marriage a hot political topic this election, with talk of a constitutional amendment to define marriage. I favor gay marriage laws at the state-by-state level. However, I do not support efforts to force private employers to provide spousal benefits to gays. Here is why. ...</description>
      <link>http://www.danfernandes.com/IssuesOpinions/tabid/125/EntryID/15/Default.aspx</link>
      <author>Dan@DanFernandes.com</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.danfernandes.com/Default.aspx?tabid=125&amp;EntryID=15</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 00:50:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.danfernandes.com/DesktopModules/Blog/Trackback.aspx?id=15</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All State Ballot Measures in Brief (Nov 2004)</title>
      <description>Recommendations for all State Ballot Measures in Brief (Nov 2004)</description>
      <link>http://www.danfernandes.com/IssuesOpinions/tabid/125/EntryID/20/Default.aspx</link>
      <author>Dan@DanFernandes.com</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.danfernandes.com/Default.aspx?tabid=125&amp;EntryID=20</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2004 23:59:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.danfernandes.com/DesktopModules/Blog/Trackback.aspx?id=20</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legalize Marijuana</title>
      <description>I have never used marijuana and don’t even know anyone who does. So how can I be so sure it is safe to make marijuana legal? The answer is simple. Legalizing marijuana has nothing to do with how safe or how harmful it may be. Lots of substances are harmful (like cyanide, and arsenic), yet BATF and DEA SWAT teams are not breaking down doors in the night looking for them. ...</description>
      <link>http://www.danfernandes.com/IssuesOpinions/tabid/125/EntryID/14/Default.aspx</link>
      <author>Dan@DanFernandes.com</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.danfernandes.com/Default.aspx?tabid=125&amp;EntryID=14</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2004 03:22:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.danfernandes.com/DesktopModules/Blog/Trackback.aspx?id=14</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>